Dating techniques dvd
Evidence for the Big Bang: NASA, Lawrence Krauss, et al., say it's the theory's predictions.
* The Big Bang's Failed Predictions and Failures to Predict: (Updated Aug 3, 2017.) As documented below, trust in has been misplaced when compared to the actual astronomical observations that were made, in large part, in hopes of affirming the theory.
The Day We Found the Universe, Princeton's cosmologist James Peebles, A Different Approach to Cosmology, Discovering the Expanding Universe, and the proceedings of a conference titled, The Big Bang and Georges Lemaître.
“In fact, studies we have done show that the distribution of matter is fractal, just like a tree or a cloud.” Adds New Scientist, "If this dissenting view is correct and the Universe doesn’t become smoothed out on the very largest scales, the consequences..." for any materialist, secular cosmology are hard to overestimate.
(If you're interested in helping RSR research this topic further, please see below, Research Questions.) * The Physicists Contradicting the Alleged Confirmations of the Big Bang: To repudiate the - a Nobel scientist who won the prize for the discovery of the CMB - distinguished professors of physics from prestigious institutions like Princeton - America's premier particle physics lab, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory - Cambridge University's nd the theory never predicted the origin of dark matter (see next section), a probably-non-existent material needed to explain a big bang universe.
For a creationist and a secular explanation of this problem, see creation.com's report on the Discovery Channel's How the Universe Works, and see this Fermilab antimatter video: Yet even secular science authorities have begun objecting to the systematic misattribution, and hence, post-dating, of the the claim of expansion.
Expansion was not a "prediction" of the 1931 big bang theory; it was a 1920s interpretation of both Einstein's equations and red-shift data.